Tainting the soul : Purity concerns predict moral judgments 4 of suicide
نویسندگان
چکیده
27 Moral violations are typically defined as actions that harm others. However, suicide is 28 considered immoral even though the perpetrator is also the victim. To determine whether 29 concerns about purity rather than harm predict moral condemnation of suicide, we 30 presented American adults with obituaries describing suicide or homicide victims. While 31 harm was the only variable predicting moral judgments of homicide, perceived harm 32 (toward others, the self, or God) did not significantly account for variance in moral 33 judgments of suicide. Instead, regardless of political and religious views and contrary to 34 explicit beliefs about their own moral judgments, participants were more likely to morally 35 condemn suicide if they (i) believed suicide tainted the victims’ souls, (ii) reported greater 36 concerns about purity in an independent questionnaire, (iii) experienced more disgust in 37 response to the obituaries, or (iv) reported greater trait disgust. Thus, suicide is deemed 38 immoral to the extent that it is considered impure. 39 ! 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.
منابع مشابه
Tainting the soul: purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide.
Moral violations are typically defined as actions that harm others. However, suicide is considered immoral even though the perpetrator is also the victim. To determine whether concerns about purity rather than harm predict moral condemnation of suicide, we presented American adults with obituaries describing suicide or homicide victims. While harm was the only variable predicting moral judgment...
متن کاملPurity matters more than harm in moral judgments of suicide: response to Gray (2014).
Many people judge suicide to be immoral. We have found evidence that these moral judgments are primarily predicted by people's belief that suicide taints the soul and by independent concerns about purity. This finding is inconsistent with accounts that define morality as fundamentally based upon harm considerations. In this commentary, we respond to a critique of our finding, and we provide fur...
متن کاملHarm concerns predict moral judgments of suicide: comment on Rottman, Kelemen and Young (2014).
Two prominent theories offer different perspectives on the role of harm in moral cognition. Dyadic morality suggests that harm-related concerns are pervasive, whereas moral pluralism suggests that these concerns apply only to canonically harmful violations (e.g., murder), and not impure violations (e.g., suicide). Rottman et al. (2014) contrast these two theories by examining moral judgments of...
متن کاملDisgust and the moralization of purity.
Guided by appraisal-based models of the influence of emotion upon judgment, we propose that disgust moralizes--that is, amplifies the moral significance of--protecting the purity of the body and soul. Three studies documented that state and trait disgust, but not other negative emotions, moralize the purity moral domain but not the moral domains of justice or harm/care. In Study 1, integral fee...
متن کاملPERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations
How and why do moral judgments vary across the political spectrum? To test moral foundations theory (J. Haidt & J. Graham, 2007; J. Haidt & C. Joseph, 2004), the authors developed several ways to measure people’s use of 5 sets of moral intuitions: Harm/care, Fairness/reciprocity, Ingroup/loyalty, Authority/ respect, and Purity/sanctity. Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consiste...
متن کامل